People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively
The rules that are implemented by authority should not be blindly followed by the people, instead
they should question wheather they are valid, reasonable or not. We live in a society where one must
abide by rules. An orginization or a society should have set of rules for the people to follow which
would ensure smooth functioning otherwise it would make things unorganized and caocathic. These
rules are designed by a group of people and as we know humans don't always produce perfect work, there
might be some flaws in the rules or they might as well be completely invalid, unreasonable or unfair to
the people. Therefore people should have tendency to atleast check the scope and validity of the rules
they are or will be following.
Authorities design and implement the rules so that the following society or organization functions in
a systematic way. However sometime these rules might turnout as mere burden to the people and become more
bad than good to them. For example in India when the GST tax was newly implemented it was wowed all over
and praised for the bold action of the government against the corruption. The rules implemented unified
taxing all over the nation for consumer goods scraping all other several taxes. But after few days people
found that they were being charged more every where. Espically for food, due to GST people were chared
extra 12% on the total bill and this would turnout a big amount sometimes, say if the total bill at the
restaurant was 1500 Rs. then extra 180 Rs. so the total billable amount would be 1680 Rs. People found
this to be unfair. After millions of tweets and many RTI filled governemt realised this and revised the
tax from 12% to 5%. This can be good example to state that authorities can sometimes make rules that are
not fair for the people.
Sometimes the rules might exploit the people and this would be very unfair to the people. For instance
the work policy in some manufacturing companies in China would exploit people, the company would require
its workers to work for 13-14 hours a day shifts whith a very little pay. This was questioned until very
lately when people started to realize that this was a very bad policy and people were exploited and were
given very little pay. This is just one example how the orginizations would be unfair to their workers.
There are different ways that the orginization can have unfair rules and regulations. That is why it would
not be a bad idea to question the rules and regulation implemented by the authorites.
But sometimes people might overdo things that can actually hamper the good work done by the authorities.
People should not question every move of the authorities. This might discourage them or may be an unnecessary
obstacle in cause of some good work. Authorities are implementing the rules so considering that no individual
or a group would cause a situation that would cause a disharmony in the orgination or the socitey.
While it is true that authorities implement rules considering the well functioning of the society or the
orginization, but sometimes these rules can be unfair or unreasonable to the people. That is why people
should question or atleast validate the scope of the rules instead of blindly following them. History itself
has been a proof how unfair authorities can be the kings the monarchs
- Company X has just switched to a 4-day workweek, mandating that employees work 10 hours per day from Monday to Thursday instead of 8 hours per day from Monday to Friday. Although the policy is new, Company X claims that the policy will help to increase pr 50
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...a group of people and as we know humans dont always produce perfect work, there mig...
^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... unreasonable or unfair to the people. Therefore people should have tendency to atleast ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rules they are or will be following. Authorities design and implement the rul...
^^^^
Line 10, column 100, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...owing society or organization functions in a systematic way. However sometime these rules might tur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 41, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...found that they were being charged more every where. Espically for food, due to GST people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les that are not fair for the people. Sometimes the rules might exploit the pe...
^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulation implemented by the authorites. But sometimes people might overdo things...
^^^^
Line 34, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mony in the orgination or the socitey. While it is true that authorities implem...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 32.0 12.4196629213 258% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2830.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93031358885 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58963320725 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426829268293 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7769813774 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 34.0 4.97078651685 684% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256773284937 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932901248591 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797388367505 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783802495479 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668256766519 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.