The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that the welfare of people in any given nation contributes greatly to the effectiveness of a leader. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular salient to which I vehemently cling is that there are myriads of hallmarks that a leader should have in order to be effective in any society, despite the well-being of individuals. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, although the well-being and the welfare of human beings in all around the globe play a crucial rule, there are several factors that help a leader to be effective in the society. Broadly speaking, life difficulties definitely come in different forms and shapes and they can be sweet or painful as well. Indeed, no one can escape such kinds of trials and tribulations that accompany us in the whole life. So, leaders can provide an opportunity for people to deal with problems successfully. As a tangible example, when a country is in crisis or face the economic recession, inflation and so forth, recover from these situations should be leaders' first priority in order to help improve the well-being of people. To elucidate more on this issue, a leader's efforts could contribute greatly to the welfare of people indirectly owing to the fact that a leader's effectiveness is summarized in the economic prosperity, cultural flourished, no inflation and so forth, which guarantee people's well-being in the society.
Another salient point in corroborating my stance is trustworthy that not only can help a leader to be effective but also can develop the welfare of the society. If we take a minute to ponder over it, trustworthy is the most required and the most admired quality of whole effective leaders because the willingness and the ability to trust the people that you look up is absolutely essential to your ability to perform at your very best. In fact, it is a required quality for the effective leader and well-being of the society due to the fact that it can enhance the integrity of the society. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that trustworthy is one of the utmost important factors when it comes to welfare and well-being of a nation.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, maybe the well-being of people be the responsibility of other organizations and there might be no interference with leaders. Arguably, leaders should take the responsibility of countries' political issues and bend over backward for a common ground to develop the safety of the country.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
- scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. do you agree or disagree? 88
- Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public. 66
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ple indirectly owing to the fact that a leaders effectiveness is summarized in the econ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...to trust the people that you look up is absolutely essential to your ability to perform at your very...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, well, broadly speaking, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96868475992 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96420063669 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482254697286 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1700766371 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.222222222 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6111111111 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239624342321 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745192135118 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453388499501 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126873589429 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04715286898 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.