"In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the idea of compulsory voting?
The importance of voting, was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of compulsory voting has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on laws for voting in recent years. It can be agreed that strict laws for voting will be helpful for country's future but some people claim that it is unnecessary. This essay will elaborate how voting improves the quality of culture and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why compulsory voting but the most conspicuous one steams on the fact that every citizen has responsibility to support their country. Voting brings real hero in politics over fake one. Every country should put fine over voting. For instance, Australia has certain amount if citizens don't vote. This rule prove Australia's growth over development and economy. Thus, voting can play vital role in country's development and citizen's benefits.
On the contrary, some people adopted an opposing view and tend to believe that why should we pay fine or vote for someone who we don't know or don't care about. For example, many negative human being don't care who will be our prime minister. They think that it won't make any difference.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of compulsory voting is prominent, although there are some drawbacks which should not be over-looked.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-16 | Gohar Khan | 55 | view |
2018-05-17 | radhik | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ustralia has certain amount if citizens dont vote. This rule prove Australias growth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... we pay fine or vote for someone who we dont know or dont care about. For example, m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...or vote for someone who we dont know or dont care about. For example, many negative ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... For example, many negative human being dont care who will be our prime minister. Th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08974358974 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62194376105 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632478632479 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5962357243 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0714285714 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215724576949 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075522721386 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569610360254 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131856793195 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053067976372 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.