The figures below compare the percentage of Internet users in three North American countries from 1999 to 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.
The line graph provided reveals the percentage of people who used the Internet in three North American countries (namely USA, Canada and Mexico) between 1999 and 2009.
It is evident that three countries saw considerable growth in Internet use over the period shown. Overall, more people in USA and Canada accessed to the Internet than people in Mexico, and Canada had by far the highest number of internet users (the highest number of Canadians used Internet).
The number of Internet users in USA was approximately 20% in 1999. The proportions for Canada and Mexico were lower, around 10% and 5% respectively. In 2005, both American and Canadian Internet usage increased to about 60%, while the figure for Mexico just rose to about 25%.
In 2009, the percentage of Internet users was highest in Canada. The majority of Canadian population used Internet with almost 100%, compared to about 80% of Americans and about 40% of Mexicans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-19 | xuan le ngoc | 81 | view |
- The figures below compare the percentage of Internet users in three North American countries from 1999 to 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 81
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 61
- International migration in UK 61
- All cars that burn fossil fuel s should be banned and electric cars should replace them?Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure for Mexico just rose to about 25%. In 2009, the percentage of Internet user...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07741935484 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52468355545 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6291187167 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221662620288 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11271745762 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685038196512 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156305913452 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497393156159 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.