Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school?
The importance of evaluation method of accessing student's performance was always a debatable topic. Even though many people believe that this can be done by continual assessment of their assignment work and project works. On the other people are in favor of formal written examinations. I believe latter appears to be a more appropriate option. This can be analyzed by looking at both the cases with reasons and examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, the workbook assignments submitted by students are not done by them. A study by the education department of India proved that many parents help their children in the completion of their assignments. Not only this, projects are copied from other students in order to submit them on time. Thus, it is clear that it is not a reliable method to judge students' capabilities.
Secondly, the examination that is taken in educational institutions makes students learn the concept and memorize the same what they studied in the classroom. Moreover, these exams are conducted in presence of invigilator and that restricts students to take any external help. This formal written assignment shows how much grasping power does an individual have. Therefore, formal written examinations are considered as one of the most reliable methods to test one's ability.
To conclude, looking at the discussion it is clear that advantages of written formal assessment outweigh the advantages of testing by assignments and project work. I believe that written examinations method should be implemented across the globe and it can be predicted that many countries adopt this method of assessment because of its effectiveness
- The importance of cars and aeroplane in modern life Give examples 87
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 85
- Do you think cashless society is realistic and why What are the advantages and disadvantages 73
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards What are the advantage and disadvantages of this phenomenon 46
- "More information available online so library'sbook are useless" or As e-books are available onlinethese days, the value of printed books has diminished.Agree or disagree. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31954887218 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96092908109 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567669172932 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0829907605 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147147139266 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489652208006 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571122263593 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959976187158 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660527919444 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.