The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification.
The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices has always been a debatable topic. Many people working in corporate offices demand that employees behaving with such activities should be punished severely. I strongly agree with the statement that such functions are not allowed in modern society. This essay would further elaborate the reasons why it is not encouraged in office premises with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, all the companies around the globe are organized with certain guidelines and policies under different categories to support the workers and to maintain peace functioning of offices. Although belching is biological, it is an inappropriate method of releasing air from your filled stomach and it is not accepted in a social culture that we live. It also disturbs other co-workers working with you and make them feel uncomfortable. For example, employee after having heavy lunch in afternoon releases a sudden gas through his mouth which will be very disturbing to other employees.
Secondly, good understanding between employers and employees is very important as it contributes to the growth of organization but few of them don't follow the policies and create a problematic situation. There are various situations which cause these problems and further HR managers have to deal with these complaints accordingly and effectively. Some unauthorized problems that we come across in working offices are accessing restricted content from company website makes a huge loss for the employer. Furthermore, bullying other employees, bad manners, harassment, abusive language, aggressive and many more. From the above data and example, it can analyze that employee involved in such activities may also lead to termination.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that people involving in belching and behaving against company policies will be treated with strict policies and sometimes organizations ask employees to put their resignations.
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 77
- Nowadays the bickering has common trend amongst youngsters and married people This has led polygamy and high divorce rates Justify the response with your positive or negative views 79
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 82
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 77
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... growth of organization but few of them dont follow the policies and create a proble...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60191082803 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03034974799 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630573248408 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2005941299 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165904918894 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564504208017 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624583223389 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944164605845 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061245877752 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.