The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The tow pie charts exhibit the share of different sectors to the Turkish economy in the years of 2000 and 2016.
Overall, at the beginning of the period, agriculture contributed to the largest segment to Turkey's economy, while construction was the least significant part of the economy. In comparison, the economy has the least share of finance, business and others in the starting time period, whereas the healthcare and education made the highest contribution to the wealth of Turkey.
In 2000, the construction's economic share was 3% and dramatically escalated to 10% in 2016. The manufacturing sector comprised of 8% of Turkey's economy and slightly increased by 4% in the last year of the given period. With 5% share to the Turkish economy finance, business and other sectors were the second-lowest figures in 2000 and risen to 8% over the course of time.
The agricultural economic out at the beginning and the ending of the given period was 24% and 14% respectively. In the starting period, leisure and hospitality and government were responsible for 17% and 12% respectively, and both dwindled by 3% after the 16-year period. However, by contrast, the economic contribution of healthcare and education remains constant at 17% in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | hoyishamia | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-21 | moon21 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | anxiety44 | 48 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | shubham0708 | view |
- IELTS practice for task 1 about maps of Meadowside village and Foton 67
- IELTS practice for task 1 about maps of Meadowside village and Foton 67
- Parents of obese children should not be punished for making their children fat.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below shows the percentage of the people who travelled by bus in the UK from 2009 to 2013 71
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01209834626 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2766184179 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1565316255 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742362171101 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640198507907 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119464573669 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743129744191 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.