Currently there is a glut of ill-trained university graduates flooding into economies that have no use for them. Up to thirty percent of applicants should be directed to vocational colleges.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement.
Nowadays, economic market is redundant with fresh university graduates who are not properly trained in their professions. It is considered by many that thirty percent of these applicants should be send for the skill based education or training. This essay will explain the reasons why these applicants should steer to vocational colleges or why they should not before concluding.
As for those who believe that students should first send to vocational schools could be worthwhile. They feel this way because in such schools students may learn various trade skills from established professionals in the industry. For instance, someone from Electrical Engineering background will get trained from highly accredited professors and then can get establish in a good job. Overall, the notion of directing fresh graduates for vocational training is useful.
In contrast, other individuals hold the notion that university graduates should not be send to the technical education because education is beyond the vocational training. More specifically, undeniably there are certain kinds of knowledge that must be of general nature and a certain cultivation of the mind and character that nobody can afford to be without. To exemplify, education is not the preparation for the labor market rather it is for the well informed human beings and citizens. Hence, thirty percent of fresh graduates should not be compel for skill based training.
This essay has explained how university graduates should go for vocational training to get properly trained in particular skill set while education is far more than this training by building a well informed individual. To my way of opinion, I firmly believe that we should not compel the students for skill based training without their intrigues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-02 | jyotikumari042 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | jyotikumari042 | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-25 | jyotikumari042 | 80 | view |
- The use of plastic for packaging, drinking straws, and other single-use, disposable items has increasingly been highlighted as disastrous for the environment. Many online petitions have been set up to demand food manufacturers and supermarkets change thei 72
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 77
- Mass communication influence our lives especially the children.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. 80
- Poverty is a major issue world wide Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations Who should decide what the donations are spent on The people in need or the charitable organisations Support your point of view with details from your own experien 53
- Obesity has been linked to excessive sugar consumption. Some people believe that sugary drinks should be taxed to dissuade people from drinking them while others think that a tax is unnecessary and that public education is the best way to decrease sugar c 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sent'?
Suggestion: sent
...y percent of these applicants should be send for the skill based education or traini...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y they should not before concluding. As for those who believe that students sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, as for, for instance, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42446043165 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83958575217 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514388489209 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2158266263 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26479713884 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109037150253 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557473317926 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176748422594 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031037483011 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.