"Currently there is a glut of ill-trained university graduates flooding into economies that have no use for them. Up to thirty percent of applicants should be directed to vocational colleges."
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement.
Numerous universities are producing more and more graduates every year worldwide. Nowadays, immense number of fresh graduates who are not properly trained are coming into the economies and some people argue that up to thirty percent of them should be sent for professional training. This essay will discuss why these applicants should be sent for the vocational training or why there is no need for it.
To commence with, not all field of study requires a vocational training. Some disciplines, for example, Psychology or Philosophy, does not require any kind of practical training to pursue the career in corresponding domain. Moreover, we do not need to make our society a labor force, although it should be a combination of all kinds professions which emphasize on education rather than getting trained professionally and thus, a job-related training is not required for all graduates
Having said that, for most of the courses job-related training is a prerequisite before entering into business world. Courses such as engineering, teaching, medical, and etc., requires a proper hands on experience or training from experts belonging to that particular field. By getting trained from the expert trainers, the students will be more likely to perform well in their future organizations. Hence, it is worth to sent the fresh graduates for vocational training for their better career.
This essay discussed how the purpose of vocational training is not worth for every field of study, however, it may be required for the disciplines which is related to practical aspects. In my opinion, up to thirty percent of applicants should not be allocated to the professional training without their own consent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-02 | jyotikumari042 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | jyotikumari042 | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-25 | jyotikumari042 | 80 | view |
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 77
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work How far do you agree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons or examples 80
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 77
- Eventually, electric cars will solve all of our transport and environmental issues.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of electric cars with regards to this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience o 72
- Obesity has been linked to excessive sugar consumption. Some people believe that sugary drinks should be taxed to dissuade people from drinking them while others think that a tax is unnecessary and that public education is the best way to decrease sugar c 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...such as engineering, teaching, medical, and etc., requires a proper hands on experience ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31365313653 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95059928453 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557195571956 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1598769087 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297423995693 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118602932152 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729240857318 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198586894714 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784771462217 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.