Nowadays, there is a colossal upsurge in a trend to see that citizens emphasize on the government to construct new roads and bridges to alleviate the traffic jams created by private vehicles. However, this concept would add further to the burning question of environmental degradation. I am of the opinion that rather the network of public transport should be strengthened to accommodate more passengers. In this essay, I shall discuss the key points on both the sides with a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of merits which can be attributed to the improving network of public transport. The most conspicuous one is that with more people using public transport to commute less traffic would be there on the roads. Not only this concept would make the travelling fast due to less traffic but it will also save tons of fossil fuel which is a scarce resource of any nation, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. Needless to mention, all these merits stand the ecosystem of nature in good stead as far as pollution is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that efficient public transport would encourage private car owners to switch to the mode of transport from person vehicle to government transport as it proffers the advantages like convenience and affordability. Moreover, public transport covering every nooks and corner of the country will also give privileges to countryside population which is essential for the overall growth of the country.
To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned arguments, one can conclude that, to reduce the problem of traffic and pollution, improving public transport has far-reaching impact in positive terms than building more roads since merits of strengthened public transport are too great to ignore.
- Technological access to online music and the like should be paid or free. What do you think? 77
- Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about the practices. 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems it cause 77
- The government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. Agree or disagree? 80
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ommodate more passengers. In this essay, I shall discuss the key points on both t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24738675958 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95049746607 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588850174216 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3680055882 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.909090909 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335477357017 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109910946547 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105280848678 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18789189603 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041842314716 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.