The chart shows ways that schoolchildren go to school in three different countries.
The data given in the bar chart depict the number students go to school by six different methods of transport in Australia, USA and UK.
Overall, car is the most popular choice in the USA and UK while Australians use school bus most. Conversely, other mean of transport excepting the five mentioned methods of transport stands in the lowest point.
As can be seen from the chart, a lot of students in America and British go to school by car, at 40% and 39% respectively, compared with lower number in Australia, at 25%. School bus is the most common mean of transport in Australia, at 37%, UK has 31% of students travel by school bus, while just under a quarter of students in America use this mode of transport.
Looking at the chart in more details, Australian children stands in the highest point in travelling to school on foot and by bicycle, at 19% and 8% separately. Besides, public transport is used the most commonly in the UK, at 12%, which is slight higher than that of Australia. The category marked “other” has the lowest number, only 4% in both the USA and UK, and 6% in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-10-10 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-09 | wholemilk | 78 | view |
- The chart shows ways that schoolchildren go to school in three different countries 83
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water use for different purposes in six areas of the world. 78
- The plans below show a school library five years ago and the same library now 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64141414141 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71965359222 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2947180048 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128669409122 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637993798359 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662989134007 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099166766514 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673354257837 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.