Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The invention of private transportations, particularly in cars has been receiving a great deal of social attention due to its substantial impacts on human's life. Although some people believe that government ought to allocate more of their budget to rail than roadways, I totally agree that railways will be better for society.
To begin with, It's vulnerable that trains seem to lead people to get around a country faster and more convenient. This means that using trains is more likely to drive citizens from the drawbacks that most car user experiences, in terms of congestion and unsafeness. Instead of running as speed as cars, trains can achieve quite faster. This improvement as a solution for people to spend less tine commuting as well as more flexible time in an attempt to do something more productivity, which result in inspiring some benefits for society. Moreover, regarding its fixed timetable associated with running solely on railways, trains are considered to ease some danger in traffic. Therefore, railways play a significant role not only in meeting human's transfered demand but also in ensuring the convenience for citizens.
Secondly, locomotives tend to be less harmful to the enviroment than cars. This is due to the fact that trains have ability to carry hundred of passengers and other human's wealth, which prevents the usage of hundred of internal combustion engines, in terms of reducing the amount of carbon emission. No one could deny that the public transportations, especially in trains are more likely to be the most efficient mesurements to reduce the higher risk of climate change, which is the key foactors lead people and others animials to be on the verge of destruction.
To conclude, the government should shoulders their duties in spending more funds ro railways systems due to its improvements on journey times and less harmful to the enviroment.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 84
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of chrging people for admission to museums outweight the disavantage? 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning for a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ntion due to its substantial impacts on humans life. Although some people believe that...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... fact that trains have ability to carry hundred of passengers and other humans wealth, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...o carry hundred of passengers and other humans wealth, which prevents the usage of hun...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15960912052 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88598613245 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2547360964 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116474894188 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041311151115 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390318748056 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771566036614 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325309722616 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.