The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projected for 2050.
The given circular representations revel the information about the population according to three age groups: (0-14) years, (15-59)years and 60+ years, had shown by Italy and Yemen in the year 2000 and 2050. The given data is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that in the year 2000, people from Italy with the age group (0-14) years had the contribution of 14.3% whereas, people of Yemen had the contribution of nearly 50% of the total. In addition to this, least proportion of pie chart was covered by the people of age group above 60 in both countries Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and 2050. Moreover, in the year 2050, the different age groups: (0-14) years, (15-59) years and above 60 years, from Yemen had part 37%, 57.3% and 5.7% respectively.
Moving further, 11.6% of the total in the circular chart was contributed by the people of age group (0-14) years from Italy in the year 2050. Apart from this, people with the age group (15-59) years from Italy had the part 46.2% in the year 2050 and 61.6% fifty years ago.
Overall, it is evident that there was increasing trend of contribution shown by the people of age (0-14 ) years and decreasing trend shown by the people of age above 60 in the year 2000 and 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-12 | Nikhil Dutt Sharma | 67 | view |
- The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projected for 2050. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 67
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emission per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attenting four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...ly 50% of the total. In addition to this, least proportion of pie chart was covered by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contribution shown by the people of age 0-14 years and decreasing trend shown b...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibution shown by the people of age 0-14 years and decreasing trend shown by the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, whereas, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54298642534 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34101572402 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.398190045249 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8198115325 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249207071897 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141634571237 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837277274407 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179698817324 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472227680634 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.