The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts given side by side disclose how people in Europe changed their preferences for recreations over the period from 1985 to 1995.
In 1985, watching TV was obviously the most preferred pastime while Other was chosen the least favored. Interestingly, with a decade passing by, Watching TV still ranked top and Other received the least popularity. Meanwhile, a new genre of recreation appeared in the survey of 1995 with a rather large portion and ranked the second favorite spare-time activity.
In the survey of 1985, 32% of European residents enjoyed spending time watching TV, followed by 23% Eating Out, 21% Talking with Friends, 18 percent Talking with Family, and 6% on Other. Undergoing a slight reduction of 2% in adoration, it remained at top with 30 percent in the 1995 poll while rank shift happened among other activities.
Likewise, relaxation choices categorized into Other had the humblest share of 6% in 1985 and once again lay at the bottom in the questionnaire conducted in 1995 with a decline, dropping to 2 percent. It is noticeable that Playing Computer Games occupied the lives of 27% of the Europeans, as a renovative attraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-05 | Enkhamgalan | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-15 | Nora Peng | 78 | view |
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 11
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009. 84
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07216494845 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81014362916 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664948453608 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5307546792 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118575102768 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478392519573 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371441647809 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738962705713 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293208938677 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.