Museums are classy alternatives to mainstream entertainment that are rampant nowadays. They also have the capacity to entice people across all walks of life. However, museum administrators are caught up in a dilemma of either requiring fees or letting patrons pass through without charge. In my standpoint, the benefits of accepting payments encompass the consequences.
It is notable that charging for admissions in museums draw several disadvantages to the visiting crowd. One factor in particular is the limitation to accessibility that fees contribute. Evidently, if exhibitors will charge for the viewing of their artifacts, then needless to say, only a handful of people who have money to spare for such form of entertainment will be able to experience their exhibits. To cite as a example is a heritage site in the depressed area of our locality housing plenty of interesting historical pieces, yet, most people surrounding the gallery have not seen its interiors because they cannot afford to pay their entrance. Additionally, it is logical to assume that the decreased museum visitors also lower the tourist attractability of the city where it is built. Therefore, creating a negative impact to the town people relying on tourism for income. This was true for a city in Northern Philippines which once was a popular destination for a unique display they showcased for free. It draw the rise of shops and food establishments all over the city. However, when they started to require ticket payments, sightseers stopped going there, eventually the venue foreclosed and the economy plummeted.
On the contrary, charging remunerations, despite of the disadvantages still proved to be beneficial in numerous aspects. For one, the fees are added income for the government. Some developing countries have lesser budget for building infrastructures especially for the arts despite of their rich culture. By earning through admission fees, projects like building more museums can be financed. Aside from that, requiring payments to enter the establishment can also help curate the galleries by paying utilities and improving security systems through installation of surveillance cameras and bio-metrics systems or employing more people to take care of the displays. In that way, the encased items will stay safe and clean for more generations to see. Finally, proceeds of museum tickets will enable for more displays in the museum, such that elusive arts may even be afforded. As in the case when the Philippine government was able to buy back a painting made by a national artist that was sold abroad through revenues from an income-generating display of other artists' masterpieces. This becomes beneficial by giving museum goers more reasons to visit because there are additional sights to view.
To cumulate, the arguments for which taking payments as means to enter the museums can definitely empower the reasons for permitting them free of charge because they are profitable, in turn museums can stand on their own or even fund government activities as well as procure more items to display.
- In many cities, security measures, such as the use of video cameras in public places,are being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.Do the benefits of increased security outweigh t 73
- People are living longer Some people think that it causes big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general Discuss both views amp give your own opinion 71
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 73
- Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extend do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o experience their exhibits. To cite as a example is a heritage site in the depre...
^
Line 3, column 1016, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'draws'?
Suggestion: draws
...que display they showcased for free. It draw the rise of shops and food establishmen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 878, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that elusive arts may even be afforded. As in the case when the Philippine governm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, in particular, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2614.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 491.0 315.596192385 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32382892057 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00677775328 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 176.041082164 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57433808554 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.499342635 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.652173913 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311534350026 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841007693817 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763639080445 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184234576574 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724052696811 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.