TPO34
The article states that in the 1768 the sea cow that lived in the water around Bering Island became extinct and provides three theories concerning this extinction. However, the professor explains that these theories are not convincing and accordingly refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the extinction cause of sea cow could be overhunted by groups of native Siberian people due to the fact that sea cows were a good source of food in a harsh environment. On the opposite, the lecture refutes this point by saying that the sea cow is a massive creature with ten tons weight and native Siberian people could feed on some a little number of sea cows for a month. Also, it mentions that they did not require for hunting more sea cows, thus this theory cannot be correct.
Second, the article posits that the sea cow population may have become extinct because of ecosystems disturbances and also it could bring about declining their main source of food. In contrast, the professor remarks that ecological change really happened before the extinction and it could affect their population, but it could not kill them. In addition, other marine animals did not become extinct like whales, which the professor explains that some people that caught fishes in this area did not report anything about disturbances. Also, in this situation food shortage could not be possible for extinction.
Last but not least, it is stated in the passage that European fur traders who came to the island could be the reason for extinction owing to the fact that they hunted them for their fur. Nonetheless, the professor opposes the point by saying that when European arrived at the island the sea cows population were small and their population was decreased and European traders arrived last in the century. Resultantly, it is not a good reason for sea cows extinction.
- TPO34 76
- TPO43 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 83
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? 60
- TPO34 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that in the 1768 the ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
... European arrived at the island the sea cows population were small and their populat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, may, nonetheless, really, second, so, thus, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97476340694 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49280827277 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498422712934 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6476473651 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553964040699 0.272083759551 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206301289082 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128008809721 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32104582277 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076869497847 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.