The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The given circular chart highlights the information about the degradation of land which was caused by four main activities, and tabular chart below it, depicts the three different nations affected by the these causes during the period of 1990. The data is calibrated in per centum and it is a clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that, the three main reasons of land degradation are: over cultivation, over grazing and deforestation. Along with this, (28℅) land was degraded due to over cultivation and (30℅) land become less productive because of cutting down of trees (deforestation). Moreover, overgrazing had degraded more than a third per centum of land. In addition to this, 7℅ land had been deteriorated by the other activities.
Glancing the tabular chart, Europe had lost 23℅ of its land in the year 1990, out of which deforestation was responsible for almost half of land decline. Oceania was the second highest region as it's 13℅ land had gone due to deforestation (1.7℅) and overgrazing (11.3℅), and interesting thing was that it's deterioration because of over cultivation was nil. Apart from this, only 5℅ land of North America had been affected by these activities.
Overall, it is evident that all regions get affected by these causes, Inspite of difference in ratios, but overgrazing activity was major cause of land degradation compares to the other three of the main causes especially in Europe.
- The diagram below shows the light penetration under the ocean 82
- nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing ( for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do u think the advant 73
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 67
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing , including the process by which information is fed back to earlier to enable adjustment . 56
- The diagram below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... data is calibrated in per centum and it is a clear and coherent representation. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, so, third, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16239316239 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92725996491 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9232589582 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238235163056 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964045833956 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779769407458 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164504387643 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543238362091 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.