Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion
Some people contend that mixed ability classes are more beneficial for children’s development, than streaming them on the basis of judgement about their academic abilities. However, from my perspective, I disagree with this contention.
Admittedly, mixed ability classes provide a better environment for children’s all-round development. In such classes, children with different abilities study together, and in turn they can learn from one another. From example, a student, who is good at academic study, but weak in dancing or painting, can learn how to dance or paint form his peers. In this sense, mixed ability classes allow students to develop their abilities in different subjects, instead of only academic abilities.
Despite, the argument above, I believe streaming students brings more benefits to teachers, and students. As for teachers, separating children with better academic abilities from others facilitates effective teaching. This practice helps teachers to control their students, more conveniently and easily. Compared with mixed ability, in which teacher should consider students’ differences, when they are using teaching methodologies, streaming makes this situation simpler. To be more specific, students are at the same level of academic ability in a class, and in turn teachers can use the same methodologies for them all. In this way, the narrower the spread of ability in the class, the more convenient the teaching can be.
On top of this, steaming enables students to learn in an effective way. According to students’ different abilities, they are taught in different ways, that are more suitable for them. In the top streams, students use more difficult materials, therefore, they can learn more. In sharp contrast, teachers can explain the material, more slowly to those in bottom streams. Under this circumstance, students with different academic abilities can study effectively, and efficiently.
In the final analysis, mixed ability classes are beneficial for students’ versatile development, but in my opinion, segregating students based on different academic ability is better for both teachers and students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Meet2607 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | tahmeed1993 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | smokey | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- The diagrams below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 78
- H The diagram below shows the process of producing photographs using digital equipments. 78
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperature and rainfall in city of Kolkata. 78
- The table chart shows the information about King college in the year 1997 to 2005 in UK 64
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...inting, can learn how to dance or paint form his peers. In this sense, mixed ability...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re convenient the teaching can be. On top of this, steaming enables student...
^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...his, steaming enables students to learn in an effective way. According to students' different ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, as for, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77089783282 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06414598168 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517027863777 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7142507338 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281106887689 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102168002223 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693104355211 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181274293376 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327803357104 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.