The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of households in the categories of owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
In general, it can be seen that over the said period, the percentage of owned households rose noticeably while the reverse was true for that of rented households.
In 1918, households only accounted for around 23% of owned accommodation, which was about one third of the figure in the rented accommodation category. However, the gap between the two proportions was gradually narrowed in the following years before standing equally at the 50-percent mark in 1971.
Afterwards, until 2001, the percentage of owned households rose to peak at nearly 70% whilst that of rented households hit the bottom at a little over 30 percent. A decade later, the former dropped slightly to 64% whereas the later experienced a 6% rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- In order to be truly employable the educated person should be able to demonstrate not just knowledge but also the ability to work independently in teams How can teamwork best be encouraged and assessed in educational settings 95
- The table and charts show some information about different sports in one country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 14
- In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of a large, extended family. Is this a positive or negative trend? 84
- It has been argued that gift giving should not be encouraged, because money is often wasted on things that people do not like or want.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 73
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at the present and the future 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, third, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13986013986 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94441304746 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1798814444 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24723507244 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122560980564 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110515965398 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164782626855 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102633627852 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.