Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, the idea of banning cars from large cities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that cars’ ban avoids environmental damages, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, private vehicles is bound up inextricably with air pollution, which indicates it might lead to both carbon emissions and noxious gases. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between global warming and greenhouse effects as well as an exponential increase in single-occupant cars. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to noise pollution, carpools, and mass transportation alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of mitigating climate change is correlated positively with not only car ownership restriction but also pedestrian-friendly cities.
Within the realm of society and economy, without the slightest doubt, imposing bans on cars attribute to transportation infrastructures, in that it would come down to public transit, automotive industry, and green taxes. A salient example of such attribution is traffic congestion, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take faster and comfortable transports for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint commuters’ problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to electric cars, free rides, and even free transport services. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of social policies in the car usage reduction.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well, ” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that cars must be banned partially from large cities. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | neelu sharma | 75 | view |
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1207.87684729 159% => OK
No of words: 328.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86890243902 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41584119563 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 139.433497537 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713414634146 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 379.143842365 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7786896782 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159494282949 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424827352671 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433982047408 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951275031991 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360986811731 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 55.0591133005 251% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.