The unlimited use of cars may lead to many problems. What are these problems? In order to reduce these problems, people should be discouraged from using cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Cars have become the most essential part in a daily basis. However, with the raising number of cars in recent years, many problems that require attention from the people have occurred. For that reason, some individuals believe that discouraging humans from driving cars is the key solution for these problems. In my opinion, a few other steps could also be taken into consideration to tackle the issues.
To begin with, two main problems of unlimited car using need to be addressed. The first one to mention is that the exhausted fume produced by cars is polluting the environment severely. Research shows that the main cause of global warming, a type of air pollution, is due to the high proportion of exhausted gas in the atmosphere. The second issue is that a tremendous number of cars traveling on roads simultaneously is causing serious traffic jams in modern cities. As a consequence, governments around the world are now wasting more budget from the residents’ tax on building expensive infrastructures for car users. Unsurprisingly, discouraging the others from using their cars is what many people are suggesting to address these matters.
Fortunately, there are several other ways to deal with the aforementioned problems. Firstly, encouraging people to grow more trees in the cities is one of the most effective ways to clean the air. This could be achieved in large scale by investing in social media’s commercial or running environmental campaigns. Because the tree’s biological system helps to filter gas produced by cars, increasing the number of plants will significantly decrease the air pollution. Secondly, governments should establish laws that restricts the vehicle possession in each household. With law enforcement which is more serious than the simple discouragement, people will have to follow and reduce their personal cars.
In conclusion, while the unlimited use of cars has indeed lead to some concerning problems, discouraging people from using their vehicles is not a really efficient solution. In fact, there are other ways to address these matters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-27 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
- You are studying for a qualification, and you would like some time off work to complete it.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:Ask for some time off to complete a qualification.Suggest what you will do later at work if you have time off.Say how 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
- You agreed to take a job over the summer but due to some unexpected problems you can no longer take the position Write a letter to the manager In your letter Apologize for not being able to take the job Explain your situation Say that you would be interes 77
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion. 67
- The local government is planning to change the bus timetable. You are not happy about the proposed changes.Write a letter to the newspaper. In the letter•describe the changes•explain how that will affect you•say how you would like the service to be 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...le the unlimited use of cars has indeed lead to some concerning problems, discouragi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34337349398 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05898964076 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3625297734 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318339451369 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869820355863 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958004816941 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198407396065 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077988148017 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.