The government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the government investment in arts, music, and painting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the finance of government in mysteries is not highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that annuity reduction of government in forte can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, arts, music, and painting can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of mysteries, as well as communities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered advantages of fortes in societies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both music and painting apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, government annuities might not increase the development consequences of arts, music, and painting. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the investment of government could relate to this reality that the demerits of the advancement decrement of arts pertain to government finance. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of fortes is correlated with education. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mystery achievement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the investment reduction of government far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the finance decrement prove the significance of arts development, but also pinpoint the advancement of social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Mohammad1364 | 100 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 77
- More information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with statement? 88
- What are the advantages and the disadvantages of being over competitive to individuals and society 84
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it isimportant for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 5.75862068966 469% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60144927536 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29225635406 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1052172952 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206115441792 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716761356257 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766850604166 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117747736983 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540503434854 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.