Task 1 writing - Women employed in four countries
The line chart illustrates the number of women who were employed in four countries: United of America, Korea, Afghanistan and France from 1985 to 2005.
It is clear from the chart that USA had the highest number among the four countries. Moreover, three countries (USA, Korea, France) saw a dramatic increase in the number of female workers while Afghanistan showed a reverse pattern.
In 1985, nearly 45% of USA women went to work and this proportion reached a peak of 65% in 2000, then it slightly decreased to 60% in 2005. Although the lowest number is just 20% of Korean women had a job in 1985, it rose sharply to 40% in 2005. In contrast, France saw a substantial decline from 40% to almost a third from 1985 to 1990, then this rate went up significantly to 55% in 2005.
About one third of Afghanistan women are employed in 1985 and this figure rose considerably to 40% in 1995. Suddenly, it dropped dramatically to 10% in 2000 and continued to decrease to a very small fraction, just 2% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-08 | My | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-07 | farnaznxooo | 73 | view |
- Task 1 Writing - The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year 11
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 66
- The table illustrates the number of people going to different tourist attractions in Australia during the four-year period from 1996. 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62777777778 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61464890356 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5079846943 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.125 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144896186648 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067450926763 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562913627938 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100193313524 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463475752127 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.