It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people claim that governments should only concentrate on their citizens as there is no way to care for all people in other countries. However, I strongly believe that people can support each other worldwide by several methods.
To begin with, there are many reasons why governments should assist other nations. Firstly, all the countries can reap the benefits of international trade and investment. International business enables customers from different parts of the world to purchase products and services with a number of choices while domestic producers can develop their brand name by selling their products worldwide. Moreover, governments can make way for investing in other countries by imposing policies which are supportive and convenient. For example, Korean investors have built many factories in Vietnam due to low expense, which not only makes profit for Korean companies but creates jobs for Vietnamese people as well. As a result, the economy of all countries will develop and people’s living standard will be improved.
Another great idea is that governments should work together in the fight against epidemic diseases to protect people. In some under-developed areas, millions of children are dying and facing preventable diseases due to the lack of money. Governments can establish non-profit organizations or charity fund to provide health care and treatment for these victims in other countries. When nations join hands to combat diseases, they can stop the virus from spreading around the world so that all the citizens will be safe, which makes up a caring and humane planet.
In conclusion, governments can support all the people around the world by many solutions in economy, health care. The world will become better if all the nations join hands together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | lanhhoang | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Hau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | Dongvo | 78 | view |
| 2018-01-07 | grahamoneil | 11 | view |
| 2017-10-31 | o0olynero0o | 73 | view |
- The line graph illustrates the number of international travellers in five distinct countries (Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and USA) during the 15-year period from 1995. 73
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give yr opinion 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year. 11
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evelop and people's living standard will be improved. Another great idea ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39007092199 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77906514105 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1501809617 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233321073535 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853366175421 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768359028733 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171132610127 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669379673912 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.