It is impossible to help people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that governments budgets should not spend on helping people in other countries and just expense for their own countries. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this view.
On the one hand, the country’s budget used for their citizen with the priority is necessary. Firstly, the main source of one country budget derived from tax of their citizen so its expenditure should meet their citizen basicness at least. For example, education, environment, healthy are three main fields must be ensured. Secondly, investing in the country by their own country’s budget is also the way ensured that this budget will be generated.
However, on the other hand, I believe that spending money from country’s budget on helping people in the world is must thing do. First of all, it is a common humanity which everybody must have. We are living in the one earth, sharing one atmosphere, having one ancestor so we should help people who lack the basicness of life as a moral responsibility. Although there are many international relief organizations and charities in the world such as UNICEF, Red Cross but they can not assist all people without helping of other countries. Furthermore, helping all people in the world is also the way we help ourselves. Since this activity will make global economy increase steadily which effect on every country directly. If one country is not helping people who in poorer condition, maybe in the future citizen of their country will fall in the same condition and have no assistance from other countries.
In conclusion, although one country has many problems to tackle in their country; however, I believe that they should spend one part of their budget on helping people in in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | lanhhoang | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Hau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | Dongvo | 78 | view |
| 2018-01-07 | grahamoneil | 11 | view |
| 2017-10-31 | o0olynero0o | 73 | view |
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 81
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 56
- An increasing number of advertisement on Tv aim at children. What are the effects of television advertising? Should television advertising be controlled? 61
- It is impossible to help people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... part of their budget on helping people in in the world.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07266435986 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73313035849 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512110726644 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4439000204 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273610432896 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10694311739 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922998782705 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202712065475 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835203494586 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.