A rise in the budget allocation on railways should be made by the government compared to roads, is widely debated by some, and personally, I agree with it because railways provide comfort, faster transport and lessens environmental damage.
Railways such as MRT, LRT and PNR in the Philippines are mostly used by the Filipinos in transporting from their homes to work or to any other places. This type of transportation is preferred by some because it is faster compared to commuting by jeepneys or cars. It also provides comfort and is hassle free because you will not experience traffic congestion and you will stay fresh all day long for most of these are air conditioned. Less traffic means less pollution, and these railways decrease the amount of carbon monoxide produced by many public utility vehicles and private automobiles. Advanced type of these railways like the bullet train in China, in the UK and in Japan, mirror the economic development of each country an it somehow reveals the status of the nation.
Moreover, spending money on railways is more environmental for the reason that a limited space is needed in its construction compared to roads.This will prevent further deforestation and land degradation that road widening might cause. A small part of the budget may be use reconstruct old and existing railways instead of creating a new one to allot building trains in other locations with a complicated geographical area such as hills and mountain area. Fees of these transport system are also economical and budget wise. These payments can be used for the maintenance of the trains.
to end, spending money on railways is more practical because it provides more benefits compare to roads.
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 11
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
- Brick manufacturing 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'it'?
Suggestion: an; it
...he economic development of each country an it somehow reveals the status of the natio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...d in its construction compared to roads.This will prevent further deforestation and ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...d for the maintenance of the trains. to end, spending money on railways is more...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08833922261 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84746023973 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.01556272 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180471984228 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617767176993 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060688167936 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128227315762 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050049333908 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.