Children are often punished physically for their undisciplined nature. Some people believe that striking children is the best way to control their behaviour. However, I completely disagree with this method to manage children's conduct.
Some parents argue that slapping a child is the only solution to control him from performing unruly tasks. They feel that it will induce fear in his mind and prevent him from repeating mistakes. In some cases, it has been witnessed that children go to schools only because they are frightened of their parents, especially father. Additionally, kids complete their homework on time as they are scared of physical punishments. Above reasons explain, why some parents are compelled to smack their children.
On the other hand, the corporal punishment has more ill effects on child's brain. The force used on a child could throw him into greater depression thus causing obstacle into his development path. A child could become physically and mentally inactive due to the constant fear caused by such kind of punishments. Child psychologists categorically reject this method to make a child more obedient. In fact, they believe that a positive environment at home plays a major role in children's overall growth. Experts have warned against these measures to an extent so that some countries have termed such practices under criminal offence and domestic violence. Overall, the complete idea of corporal punishment is preposterous.
To conclude, arguing benefits of corporal punishment is baseless. Thus, in my opinion, such practices should be completely banned due to their adverse effects.
- smacking children is the best form of discipline.to what extent do you agree or disagree.Givethe reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.write atleast 250 words. 11
- In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, thus, in fact, kind of, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42913385827 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78739323367 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637795275591 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1682577267 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1176470588 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064431454231 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224259054691 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279860114032 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410676410073 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342826584962 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.