You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Wri

The bar shows a different aspects of life quality such as GPN, Daily calories, life expectancy, and Infant mortality that for the people who live in Bangladeshi, Bolivia, Egypt, Indonesia, and USA.
It can be clearly seen that people who live in USA have a highest level of life quality for GPN, where it reaches to about 13000 US dollar per head, while Bangladeshi has the lowest record near to zero. In additions, Egypt, Bolivia, and Indonesia come in the same level of it aspect.
Also, the second aspect of Daily calories, all of countries approximately have a similar supply per head except USA has a little increase than others. But, the ware about third aspect of life expectancy at birth is not have a wide known yet, that because all of countries close from zero level of life quality here. Also, the forth aspect of Infant mortality(per 1000 live births) seems very similar to third aspect.
Overall, not all of aspects which used to determine the life quality for the five countries have a sound, but the aspect of GPN is an exception.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'aspect'?
Suggestion: aspect
The bar shows a different aspects of life quality such as GPN, Daily calo...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...y seen that people who live in USA have a highest level of life quality for GPN, ...
^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...GPN, where it reaches to about 13000 US dollar per head, while Bangladeshi has the low...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...pect of life expectancy at birth is not have a wide known yest, that because all of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ths seems very similar to third aspect. Overall, not all of aspects which used t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71739130435 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44330805534 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.736496853 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145220298918 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745991636105 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382386525471 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102506505834 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194558540077 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.