Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of teachers responsibility for teaching students to judge about right or wrong and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that students' academic subjects can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, teachers responsibility can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own example, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, students' academic subjects might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teachers responsible for judgements far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | Alfred Manoj | 72 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | Alfred Manoj | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | Sridarani | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 85
- cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree? 77
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93726937269 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3766600012 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649446494465 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9722120621 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22950840066 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723466525543 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716754176462 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128543187928 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715955523129 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.