Is experiment learning (learning by doing) a better approach compared to formal education. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Is experiment learning (learning by doing) a better approach compared to formal education. Do you agree or disagree?

Undoubtedly, there are different skills which people use for learn something. Learning helps the people to use their intelligence questioned to achieve something in their life because experiment is the process of learning through experience, and is more specially defined as learning through reflection of doing. According to my perception, experiment learning is better as compared to the formal learning.

The first and foremost reason that striking to my mind is that why experiment learning is good because if people do something in practically way then they learn easily. For instance, in the medical profession doctors can do the operation of any organ of the body they learn easily as compared to the theoretical work, they easily know about the parts and history of the body parts.

On the other hand, formal education has not put adverse impact to our mental ability but it has some limitations, restrictions like a student only learn through bookish language they do not do any practical work as they only depend on the theoretical based things. Moreover, formal education is only based on the syllabus however practical work is only based on the experiments. People can learn something different as compared to the formal learning.

To conclude, it can be denied that experiment is the more effective way of learning, since in the ahead of practical life. This is not only based on the practical or theoretical method also including the intelligence level.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-04 hsiaotrio 77 view
2018-07-05 preet25 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user preet25 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rception, experiment learning is better as compared to the formal learning. The...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18828451883 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83801088299 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506276150628 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8274258953 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318938347429 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1399210977 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977986472759 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184203925154 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964872903852 0.0609392437508 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.