In the last few decades, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter whether formal written assessments method to assess students performance is effective or not. This has elicited stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas Some people say that written assessments are not very effective, but I believe that written assessments are still effective. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, Conspicuously, There are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reasons to support this notion is writing improve students communication skills which help students positively in their life. For Example, good writing skill would be required to write good and effective emails, so the students who have good command over writing skill would be more productive.
On the contrary, there are some skeptics who conjecture that written assessment is an old way and is not very effective now, as there are new practical methods which are more effective and good for students. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is not the case, as writing skill is one of the most important skill, hence replacing it with any other method would not be good for students.
After analyzing the above facts I would like to recapitulate that as writing skill is the most important skill for the students hence replacing it with any other skill would be good for students. Hence It can be clearly said that formal written assessments to assess student's performance is still and effective.
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 77
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 77
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which is more important? 77
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 85
- Should marketing for consumer goods companies like clothing and food focus on reputation or short term strategies like discount and special offers? and in what ways this can impact reputation? why? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...other skill would be good for students. Hence It can be clearly said that formal writ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, then, whereas, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19305019305 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72016970174 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494208494208 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3197859323 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214411663761 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108183429914 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789095169115 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148231089033 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717417726888 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.