The supplied pie charts depicts percentage of population in three categories in Yemen and Italy in 2000 with forecast for 2050.
It is obvious from given charts that age group of 0-14 years and 15-59 years was majority in Yemen in 2000, 50.1 per cent and 46.3 per cent. However, projection fro 2050 shows increase in group of 15-59 in about 10 per cent with opposite trend for group of young ones till 14 years to only 37 per cent.
Back to the details, all three groups had fair percentage in 2000 in Italy, but group 15-59 years represented nearly 62 per cent. Age group of 60 plus and newborns to 14, 24.1 per cent and 14.3 per cent respectively. For 2050 is forecasted that eldery people will represent just above 42 per cent, when economically productive generation 15-59 years will drop to only 46.2 per cent.
It is obviously seen from given charts, that both in both countries age distribution of their population have been different, however prediction for 2050 shows that economically productive group will be higher than other groups.
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 70
- Full time university student spend most of their time in academic subjects. Some people say that they should engage in other activities also . Do you agree or disagree? 78
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 61
- Full time university student spend most of their time in academic subjects. Some people say that they should engage in other activities also . Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
... and 46.3 per cent. However, projection fro 2050 shows increase in group of 15-59 i...
^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'plus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pluses', 'plusses'.
Suggestion: pluses; plusses
...ted nearly 62 per cent. Age group of 60 plus and newborns to 14, 24.1 per cent and 1...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7967032967 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49373687147 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6518317985 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12069696138 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077045932186 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066664840838 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108708452287 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721245118741 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.