Nowadays traffic jam is main problem for many metropolitan cities around the world. This essay will discuss this interesting topic and support with examples, how this negative aspect should be reduced.
Driving to work, school, shopping or leisure become convenient and affordable way for more individuals than ever before. Nevertheless, price of petrol escalating over decades, more people chose driving as the best method of transport. Hence this more car are on roads carrying only driver, although, network of public transport as its frequency is better than ever. However, costs of public transport might reduce its attractivity between society. For example, many cities in developed countries choose the way to provide cummuters this service free of charge. It was proven, that number of cars and congestions during peak time periods have been significantly reduced.
Secondly, despite everywhere presented tools and overpriced parking slots in city centre, municipality should implement charges to entry designated areas in cities. This might also convinced drivers to choose different way of transport. Alternatively follow practice in Japan, where government set days when cars with only even or odd number plates are allowed on street. In my opinion, this is quite discrimination way how to reduce congestions in metropolitan cities, however, results from Japan showed positive impact to traffic flow.
To sum up, there is uncountable ways how to reduce traffic jams in big cities, however, there is no correct way how to prevent this negative trend. Notwithstanding, some methods might works better than other, it is necessary to consider if human rights are not suppressed.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rel 61
- Some people think that professional athletes make good role models for young people, while others believe they don’t.Discuss both these points of views and give your own opinion. 89
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to drive'.
Suggestion: to drive
...alating over decades, more people chose driving as the best method of transport. Hence ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...riving as the best method of transport. Hence this more car are on roads carrying onl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are uncountable ways'?
Suggestion: there are uncountable ways
...e impact to traffic flow. To sum up, there is uncountable ways how to reduce traffic jams in big citie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52692307692 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81808141122 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673076923077 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4517201424 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180454100582 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573214182528 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633413949297 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112174639366 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298367795198 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.