Fatal car crashes are more often than ever before. This essay will discuss why this happening and suggest ways how this trend should be reduced.
Nevertheless, modern motor vehicles contains sophisticated equipments to reduce seriousity of injuries if car accident happened, human factor can still trick even developed technology. Notwithstanding, beginners behind the steering wheel are restricted with speed and during learning period, senior driver must accompanied them, these individuals cause the most road traffic accidents. In young age our subconsciousness is hungry after adrenalin and forcing young drivers speeding, however, not only them. Present of more fixed and mobile speed cameras on highways along with high fine for speeding might reduce fatalities on roads. On top of ban drive or extension of learner or practitioner period for newbies.
Secondly, from statistic is obvious that using cell phones and other portable devices allowing us call or being in touch with others should be totally banded. Scientists proved negative effect to paying attention while driving and using mobile phone. As many as new drivers, using mobile phone while driving caused enormous amount of an innocent lives. Although, mobile phone is not in driver hands, the noises coming from devices might affect drivers concentration as well. To prevent this, New South Wales Police Force installed spy cameras to catch car drivers who use cell phones while driving even waiting on traffic lights.
To sum up, there are uncountable ways, how to reduce lost of innocent lives caused by road traffic accident. As powerful might be reduction and Acts by local governments, people should acknowledge price of the life.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010. 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 84
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48120300752 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6543696248 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699248120301 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6221953878 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926548702392 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296431112756 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481422973213 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575629083793 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415486184328 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.