Some people believe that limiting the speed of vehicles to increase road safety is necessary, whereas others think that there are other ways to do so. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
These days more and more people are drawing conclusions that to reduce the chances of road hazards and/traffic mishaps there must be laws to reduce/limit the speed of cars and other transportation means on the road. On the other hand, there is a school of thought that believes there are numerous other ways to increase road safety. In following few lines I'll pen down both the views with relevant examples.
Today we live in an era of competition, speed and efficiency. And in order to keep abreast with the time, we often fall prey to unnecessary overspeeding consequently the frequency of road hazards and mishaps has increased a great deal. For instance, according to recent facts and figures, in USA road accidents kill more people than cancer annually. In order to control or reduce this horrifying number, I am a strong advocate of implementing such strict laws which would help increasing road safety and which would make drive time more secure through limiting speed.
In contrast to above there is a school of thought that believes there are different other ways with which road hazards can be reduced. For example, the number of speed breakers and traffic signals can b increased to avoid accidents. However, this is in contradiction to contemporary international laws which oppose the installation of speed breakers as they harm vehicles pretty badly.
To recapitulate, I pen down that the idea of reducing speed limits by making proper and rational laws is the best possible solution to this out grown overspeeding and traffic mishaps issue. And to do that sincere deliberation on traffic laws is required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-11 | Fahad Arif | 73 | view |
- Write a letter to your manager to tell him/her about some company documents that you lost while travelling with them, please sayWhat were the documents?Where and when did you travel with them?Suggest a solution for this situation. 73
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 56
- Some people say that cities are a better place for children to grow up in, while others believe countryside is the right choice. Discuss both views, give your own opinion and examples 73
- Some people think they have a right to use as much freshwater as they want. Other believe Governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays plastic money replacements such as credit and debit cards are extremely popular, even more than banknotes and coins. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Include your personal opinion and examples based on your own experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ase road safety. In following few lines Ill pen down both the views with relevant e...
^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'pens'.
Suggestion: pens
...road safety. In following few lines Ill pen down both the views with relevant examp...
^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to increase' or 'increase'.
Suggestion: to increase; increase
...nting such strict laws which would help increasing road safety and which would make drive ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05576208178 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80795904313 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568773234201 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4495478621 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256904046625 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922725357623 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714091309644 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153049315542 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831531663682 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.