It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life, as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry, has negative effects on individuals, nations and the globe. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The topic centering on whether living a life with a fast space resulting directly from rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry brings benefits or drawbacks is a debated question among nations and their citizens for centuries. Some advocate that this can affect individuals, nations and the globe adversely while it is my contention that this trend brings both merits and demerits.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that there are obvious benefits of the fast pace of life. On advantage is that breakthroughs in telecommunication makes it possible for mobile users to save a great deal of money for travelling to meeting places. In fact, people can find themselves contacting with others over voice or video calls instead of commuting to somewhere to have face-to-face communication, thereby reducing daily expenditures and their valuable time. Another plus point is that thanks to the help of express means of transport including buses including buses, trains and cars, people and goods are likely to be transported in quick ways form place to place within a city or a nation or out of borders, thereby making life of common people and business men more convenient.
On the other hand, the downsides also persist. On demerit is that availability for contact over phones can make mobile users ‘lives more stressful. White collar workers, for instance, cannot have a good vocation with their friends or families if they can be accessible via calls or text messages sent by their bosses to ask them about their work. Another consideration is that authorities are more likely to find it harder to cope with international criminals. Drugs and illegal goods can be delivered across border on express and economic air flights and their activities can be planed ahead through the usage of private phone calls.
In conclusion, despites the fact that the fast pace of life makes our lives more stressful and insecure, I am of the opinion that their positive sides cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-18 | thaohienpt008 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | vantran2297 | 95 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | ntphuc0101 | 96 | view |
- Some people think that radio has been out of date and there is no need to listen to the radio for entertainment and news Do you agree or disagree 95
- Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions 93
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and the globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 63
- Environmental problems are serious many countries It means that the only possible way to protect the environment is at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree on this hypothesis 98
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'including buses'.
Suggestion: including buses
... the help of express means of transport including buses including buses, trains and cars, people and goods are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15197568389 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87663595437 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601823708207 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0536065872 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4166666667 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135223233464 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050922546247 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069493012768 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996308503356 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813807967707 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.