The line graph demonstrates the percentage of Australian population watching movie in a theathre changed from 1990 to 2010. The movie lovers are divided in four different group of various ages i.e. 14-24 y.o., 25-34 y.o., 35-49 y.o., and 50 y.o. onwards. Overall, all of those populations were reported to have upwards trends with different details. \
In 1990, teens and adults aged under 25 years old became the biggest population coming to a cinema by almost 90%. Meanwhile, the three other groups were far below in about 60% of 25-49 years old, and nearly 40% of more 50 years old. Further, people aged 14-24 y.o. had a minimal increase by almost 100% in 2010, but it was still being the dominant population compared to people aged 25-34 y.o., 35-49 y.o., and above 50 y.o. by about 85%, more 70%, and around 60%, respectively.
Finally, people aged under 25 y.o. was recorded to love attending cinema very much and was predicted to be remain on the top population of movie viewers until the year 2010.
- The Growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in a effort to deal withthe health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 56
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York in last year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006. 78
- Some people think that children should obey rules and do what their parents and teachers want them to do. Other people think that children controlled too much can not deal with problems themselves in adulthood.Discuss both views and state your opinion. 67
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...ie lovers are divided in four different group of various ages i.e. 14-24 y.o., 25-34 ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81609195402 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3657418908 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1696893337 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967300135442 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504664485061 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265605346453 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692770571857 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00753591767356 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.