Many lives are in danger when hastily erected buildings collapse because safety standards have been sacrificed to hopes of a quick profit To prevent disasters of this kind governments should play a greater role in setting and enforcing safety standards fo

Essay topics:

Many lives are in danger when hastily erected buildings collapse because safety standards have been sacrificed to hopes of a quick profit.To prevent disasters of this kind,governments should play a greater role in setting and enforcing safety standards for building construction.Do you agree or disagree?

With the rise in modernisation a man has transformed his life tremendously.There is no doubt,buildings are considered as a boon for us.The given topic asserts that buildings are collapsed more in this era just because of a quick profit.However, should government play a role either on safety standards for building constructions or not? I agree with this statement. My piece of writing will discuss my views in the upcoming paragraphs before reaching at any conclusions.

Taking one side of the argument, there are numerous causes behind this issue. First and foremost, undoubtedly, it is the big responsibility of government how to provide safety measurements for individuals to prevent buildings like rules and regulations because if engineer are build strong base of building automatically buildings are more strong. Moreover, vertical buildings have been not destroyed by disaster. Secondly, government establish strict rule to stop the illegal activities. Generally, we see nowadays mostly engineers are build buildings with unpure material such as they not use good material for building purposes. As a result, government should stop these type of activities. The particular refer to example of people who involved to destroy buildings. They capable to capital punishment which provided by government.

On the flip side, material which are used by sky crapers that type of material should be checked by higher authorities with the help of machines because if material will not good also sky crapers will damage. In addition to, not only material but also maps both are checked by higher authority to maintain the buildings purposes. Moreover, maps are using for different path to different issues. If government provide good material for building constructions so that is why sky crapers are not preying of disasters.

Hammering on the last nail, I believe there is no single conclusion because it is the not only responsibility of government but also masses like how to prevent buildings by using good material.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (11 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-15 akash chalotra 68 view
Essays by user akash chalotra :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...n has transformed his life tremendously.There is no doubt,buildings are considered as...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , buildings
... his life tremendously.There is no doubt,buildings are considered as a boon for us.The giv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ildings are considered as a boon for us.The given topic asserts that buildings are ...
^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...this era just because of a quick profit.However, should government play a role either o...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38364779874 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13597544569 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.6944677714 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204023880087 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589889159202 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635831885749 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123811872207 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628241296198 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.