Thé bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personal department at a major company . The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers : those aged from 18- 30 and
those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance.
The historical graph illustrates the information about the results of survey which conducted by a major company during two different aged groups 18-30 to 45-60 during this graph.
To begin with, the work performance of team spirit duringhabe 30 age group intially is 60% . Moreover, it is increased by 90% in case of personal development and touched the peak value . But the work performance of working environment slightly decreased by 80% in youth. However, percentage of not only competent boss but also job security both are declined by nearly 45% respectively. Furthermore, 45-6o age group affect the work performance in team spirit is less than personal
development that is 60% . In addition to, in case of old people work performance in job security is 40%.
Moving further, work performance affected by youngsters during colleagues less as compare to Promotion prospects that is mearly 34%. Thereafter, Job satisfaction ,and work environment both having nearly 30%in youth. however, colleagues have 40% .But, not only promotion prospects But also Job satisfaction are affecting work performance during 45-60 age group. Thereafter, the percentage of old people is increased by money which is 65%.
Overall, it is evident that youngsters are affecting more as compare to old people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-26 | akash chalotra | 67 | view |
- Many lives are in danger when hastily erected buildings collapse because safety standards have been sacrificed to hopes of a quick profit To prevent disasters of this kind governments should play a greater role in setting and enforcing safety standards fo 68
- The best way to reduce the traffic accident is to make all young drivers complete a safe driving course before being licence to drive discuss. 56
- Some people believes that children leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Thé bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personal department at a major company . The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers : those aged from 18- 30 andthose aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 67
- The best way to reduce the traffic accident is to make all young drivers complete a safe driving course before being licence to drive discuss. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk performance of team spirit duringhabe 30 age group intially is 60% . Moreover,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ringhabe 30 age group intially is 60% . Moreover, it is increased by 90% in cas...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l development and touched the peak value . But the work performance of working env...
^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s than personal development that is 60% . In addition to, in case of old people w...
^^
Line 6, column 80, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed by youngsters during colleagues less as compare to Promotion prospects that is ...
^^
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mearly 34%. Thereafter, Job satisfaction ,and work environment both having nearly ...
^^
Line 6, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...onment both having nearly 30%in youth. however, colleagues have 40% .But, not only p...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...%in youth. however, colleagues have 40% .But, not only promotion prospects But ...
^^
Line 6, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...n youth. however, colleagues have 40% .But, not only promotion prospects But als...
^^^
Line 6, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uth. however, colleagues have 40% .But, not only promotion prospects But also Jo...
^^^
Line 8, column 59, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...dent that youngsters are affecting more as compare to old people. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99665191625 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7173494227 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231427399348 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853810591937 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796653580066 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124260959376 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824832561422 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.