Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the modern era of education, children are required to be encouraged with various beneficial techniques to make them successful in life. Proponents opine that competitive skills must be instilled in students while opponents suggest that teaching them to co-operate can reap much more merits in their upbringing. This essay will discuss both these aspects and argue why co-operation among kids has outweighing positives.
On the one hand, encouraging children with a sense of competition improves the performance factor. Peer competition provides students the urge and necessity to perform well and prove themselves to the best of their abilities. For instance, conducting a swimming race for pupils shows the competitive spirit among them and the requirement to perform their best in order to bag the prize. This sense of competitive attitude allows youngsters to achieve more with boldness and confidence. Furthermore, this competing sense leads to victory with consistent hard work and effort thereby enabling them to taste the fruit of success.
On the other hand, although competitive skills can help in achieving success, teaching children co-operation enables them to grow better as an individual and handle any kind of situation. They must be taught that even in cases where individual performance may not provide victory, teamwork and coordination among fellow mates can bring out the best from within. In addition, by learning to be co-operative, students acquire knowledge about the team player skills at a younger age that will make a great difference in future. To give a clear example, the success of any organisation depends entirely on the employees' teamwork and co-operation.
In conclusion, although motivating young ones with competitive skills improves their performance, providing them the knowledge of co-operation and teamwork helps in upbringing them as much better adults in future. Thus, it is evident that advocating children with the sense of co-operation outweighs the other aspect.
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 79
- You have recently joined to a new job. Write a letter to your English-speaking friend. In your letterExplain why u moved from previous jobDescribe your new jobTell your friend any news you want to share 78
- Immigration has a major impact on the society What are the main reasons for immigration To what consequences can it lead 78
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller? 56
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough time on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r age that will make a great difference in future. To give a clear example, the success o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ny organisation depends entirely on the employees teamwork and co-operation. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n upbringing them as much better adults in future. Thus, it is evident that advocating ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52258064516 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99107239094 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1419860519 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208486790862 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080290599572 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483165372085 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137310810611 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214665858545 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.