The communication technologies are continuously increasing among people from day to day. Especially in developed countries, the number of people use modern communication devices for connection with each other. It is agreed that the information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some positive and negative effects on an individual’s life as well as on society. This essay will analyze the reasons in detail.
One of the most important evidence that communication technology has positive effects on the society is that people can have much information from social media. Inhabitants of modern societies understand the value of social media. For instance, people use social media such as Facebook and Twitter for information such as news, sports and politics. Therefore, people can access social media to have information.
I
n many cases, it is observed that mass communication has negative effects on individual’s lives as well as on the society. It has been anticipated by many sociologists and researchers that a high number of people spend most of their time using mass communication. For example, instead of people meet each other, they use mass communication such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter for interact. For this reason, sometimes, new communication technologies have not been the successful everyday life of people.
In light of above-supported arguments, it is concluded that new technological changes have a positive and negative effect on the individual’s lives. As discussed, a number of people use these for positive and negative influence.
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities?You should give reasons for your answer using your own 56
- Global warming is the most serious issue that world is facing today .what are the cause .what measures government of individual take to tackle this issue. 56
- Nowadays, more and more foreign students are going to English-Speaking countries to learn the “international language – English". It is undoubtedly true that studying English in an English-speaking country is the best way, but it is not the only way t 56
- 20.09.2017 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- Nowadays more and more foreign students are going to English Speaking countries to learn the international language English It is undoubtedly true that studying English in an English speaking country is the best way but it is not the only way to learn it 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55284552846 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42129624971 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4116399238 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220256670002 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082568593554 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427915412764 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149782821717 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049886260766 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.