do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting?
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing investment in art and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of public happiness is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that financial problems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing budget in music can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of public awareness, as well as art galleries, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered financial dilemmas. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both musical instruments and drawing portraits apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, increasing public awareness about the importance of government’s role in the painting might increase the consequences of copyright. Moreover, fundamental aspects of brilliant paintings can relate to this reality that demerits of public encouragement pertain to taking risks. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a private institution is correlated negatively with NGOs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of holding concerts.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing the government’s investments far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of private funds prove the significance of mental health, but also pinpoint prestigious art piece implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-20 | sadegh shahsavand | 77 | view |
- do you agree that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life? 85
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 69
- do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others? 88
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- do you agree that universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78326996198 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39810802783 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657794676806 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9890392978 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.272727273 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964434712057 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329952151588 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283826620174 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541419550993 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237991221039 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.