The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table reveals the expenditure of three categories of consumer products across five nations in the year of 2002.
To begin with, it is clear from the information provided that spending on products entailing food, drink and tobacco was incredibly enormous in Ireland and Turkey, whereby such expenditure accounted for some one-third of their overall living costs. By contrast, other nations saw an approximately halved figure in this cost relating to diet.
Evidently, Italian investment on clothing and footwear reached 9%, while such spendings in each other nation were practically identical at 6%. Meanwhile, regarding the public service sector, activities encompassing leisure and education costed a relatively insignificant ratio. Obviously, a meagre 4% of average spending in Turkey was responsible for the cost paying the fee for amenities and cultivation, which was doubled that of its counterparts in Ireland and Spain.
Overall, dietary expenses comprised a considerable proportion in cost of living for all five countries, surpassing the spending on public service and clothing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | vongocson | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | Rahil shelat | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | alona2501 | 11 | view |
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 84
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, third, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71341463415 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01598828021 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69512195122 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.124413593 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898615183422 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408472929991 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421942236025 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643379608437 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039352390499 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.