Capability of students to work together depends on their personal characteristics, such as responsibility, reliability and scrupulosity. However, I ween that whether a student possess this qualities or not, it is still more effectively to work under a project in a group. I will reinforce my opinion by providing several examples.
In the first place, working is a group has a advantage that all the responsibilites can be seperate between each group member. Voluminous project’s tasks are hard to do for one person, even if the person is genious. I have an obvious example of it in my personal experince. I was an ambigouos student and supposed that I have had much forces to do one important biology projest in solitary. Moreover, I had onle a couple of weeks to fulfil it, and on the second week I felt lost and stressed out because of the coming dedline. Fortunately, in the most critical moment my classmate generously supported me by helping with a presentation and cheered my up. There is no doubs that her supportion was vitably important for my and for my project’s grade. Moreover, I daresay that it is important that group members can cover each over and a project will not stuck on one place.
Secondly, working under particular project implies and includes various spheres of work. Usually, a group where every member is a specialist in the concequent field benefits the most to the future success. For instance, an idea of the opening a new company also in some ways is a project. A lot of members taking part in this hard work: economist is in charge of the budget, manager plans the future development of the company, promoter developes commertials and advertise the future product, and, at the end, director controls all the process, how all the parts overlap and make the hole picture of the future company. In the light of above, I can hardly imagane the company which was invented and successfully developed by one person.
To recapitulate, working together is a valuable experience for every student. Moreover, I suppose that the effectiveness of the group work even isn’t under comparison with the working alone.
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 70
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 49
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., I ween that whether a student possess this qualities or not, it is still more effe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the first place, working is a group has a advantage that all the responsibilites ...
^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...os student and supposed that I have had much forces to do one important biology proj...
^^^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'stick'
Suggestion: stick
... cover each over and a project will not stuck on one place. Secondly, working unde...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i suppose, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96408839779 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00886052506 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8475598573 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161844384836 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553653105703 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545687767928 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123196465524 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510073936003 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.