The pie charts show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The two pie charts provided unfold the change of expenses by families among the five major categories in year 1950 and 2010.
As for data in 1950, it is clearly established that accommodation comprised the largest portion of over staggering two third of total expenditure in 1950. Second in terms of household spending was food, which accounted for 11.2% of the whole. In addition, expenses of the rest of major categories, namely, health care, education and transportation represented insignificant proportion at below 7% each.
Evidently, the proportion of the spending of each category changed drastically in 2010, among which expenses of food witnessed a surge by over three folds to reach 34% and overtook housing as the majority of the expenditure by families. Cost for living, meanwhile, plummeted over 50% to roughly a quarter of the total expense. Also, interesting is the fact that although both health care and education still required under 7% of the total expenditure after six decades, the expenses of the former one doubled whereas the latter one remained almost identical. Lastly, traffic costs and other category saw dramatic rise to reach 14% and 19.2% respectively.
Overall, housing and food remained as the top two major sources of home spending while the cost spent on the other categories had a general increase.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students Use specific reasons and details to support your answer You should write at least 250 words 80
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport 84
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back Things to include Facts You need to be concise but explain what happened Polite N 16
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past, what are the reasons for this? What do you think can be done for it? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23611111111 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84691356352 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606481481481 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0941395478 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142019584152 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565607893245 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699840498315 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09516431428 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077943172698 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.