People living in large cities today face many problems in their every day life. What are their problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?
It is true that more and more people staying in large cities to earn a living. Several problems have resulted from this tendency and they should be tackled by government ‘s policies which motivate resident to move to out skirt areas.
Living in big urbans, citizens face to main issues. Firstly, due to polluted environment, residents witness a considerable deterioration in their health. As a result, a large number of them suffer pains later in life. Let ‘s take Hanoi as a stark instance, had it not been for the air and water pollution, this city would have never experienced an extremely high proportion of residents having lung cancer like this. Secondly, citizens may be under rush hour traffic jam in their daily moving to work.
This is conducive to wasting time on commuting as well as reduction in their productivity.
Since such issues are serious, the authority should take the idea of encouraging people to come to smaller towns into consideration immediately. Initially, thanks to fresh air condition, people are bestowed upon the chances to strengthen their health. In deeds, with more trees, rivers and mountains around, countrysides give residents an easier access to enjoy natural landscapes which motivate them to do regular exercise. Thus, they find the ways to cultivate their both psychological and physical health. Additionally, hardly does traffic jam occur in extramural sites. This creates a favorable condition for workers and employees to be on time at their offices. Not only does this help to boot their effectiveness at work, it also saves them more time for caring their families.
In conclusion, there a variety of negative consequence of committing with live in big urbans. Only by encouraging citizens to relocate to less crowded areas, do governments to resolve such problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-07 | Dongz Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 84
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 78
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their every day life. What are their problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about the 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rioration in their health. As a result, a large number of them suffer pains later in life. Let &a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22372881356 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84248961284 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0021625713 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6470588235 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257757948577 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714712366098 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436137682124 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1215157005 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493544414591 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.