the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The given table graph illustrates a large discrepancy between the percentage of the impoverished living in different household categories in Australia in the particular year 1999.
Overall, it is obvious that sole parent accounted for the highest proportion of Australian from every family type living in destitution in the given year. Nevertheless, the highest number of that is all households in comparison with the others.
The year 1999 witnessed the highest percentage of sole parent standing at 21%. Additionally, it was twice as high as the proportion of all households occupying 12%. Following the second position, the family type being single, no children allocated for 19%. Otherwise, at 8%, the proportion of single aged person was twice as high as that of aged couple (4%), which also was the lowest.
Aside from the convertible data, the highest number of the poor from each Australian household type was all households being equivalent to 1,837,000, instead of sole parent (232,000). The couple of children was estimated 933,000 being the second place. Furthermore, despite the percentage of single aged person doubled that of aged couple, the number of those generally coincided each other, which was 55,000 and 48,000 respectively.
- what are disadvantages and advantages of having older people living in the family home 73
- The chart below show the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 69
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisons where relevant. 11
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The chart shows the number of female and male people arrested by type of offence crime 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36224489796 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89038154881 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0373704937 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139288805549 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597475659619 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840014791711 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117207054017 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104422625539 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.