Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples
The question that local shoppers are facing less demand of customer, due to multiplex is highly contentious concern. In my opinion, due to a lot of facilities and taste of customers, interest for local shopkeepers are decreasing drastically. In the following paragraph, I will further explain my point of views with required examples and arguments.
There are myriad of reasons why public is attracting towards multiplex. Firstly, most of target customers of big malls are youngsters. These kind of customer are more used to of luxury. For an instance, they are having tendency that shop keeper should pay personal touch, should have clean wash-rooms due to major time will be spend in mall, air conditioner etc. Secondly, due to lack of time, everyone want to do shopping as fast as possible and with multiple options which only can be possible in malls. Consequently, malls are providing everything under single roof whether it could be groceries, food court, clothing, or entertainment. Finally, major problem of each developed city is parking but due to enormous parking slot, this problem is also taking care by multiplex which local shop keepers are not able to provide. Henceforth, small shops are facing a major loss.
Another pivotal hidden aspect of multiplexes are hidden and excessive cost for mostly everything. These kind of giants shop keepers under vast malls are charging any kind of amount. Sometimes, similar kind of things can be found in local market at affordable price. Furthermore, we can say that on weekends, there is a huge crowd attracting towards malls. Consequently, either there is long queue for parking or some people do not even find parking slot. Some malls are also charging extra bucks on weekends as well.
In conclusion, we can say that local shop owners are affecting not only from business prospective but also they have to struggle for their existence. Less number of customers can lead to big loss for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Yomigae | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | maniram vicky | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | maniram vicky | 77 | view |
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools, especially at the preschool level. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- The packaging of products should be avoided by the producer or consumer should avoid it 56
- Ways of communication were different 10 years back. How have this changed over the period? What are the pros and cons of these changes? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
... customers of big malls are youngsters. These kind of customer are more used to of luxury....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...d excessive cost for mostly everything. These kind of giants shop keepers under vast malls...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.5418719212 218% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09316770186 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71481155274 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3906821212 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115503411406 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033903653604 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344741533551 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062026337539 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342462778369 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.