Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
With the increase in population, man is approbriating the forest at an alarming rate. Huge wilderness areas are cleared and destroyed for the purpose of - construction, procuring natural resources and agriculture. Is a stringent law is required by every nation to preserve remaining forests? The answer to this question hinges on the status of a nation's economy. For a country with unstable and poor economy it is not advisable, but for a devepoed nation with well to do economy, laws should be passed to stop distruction of wilderness ares.
Firstly, lets take the case of poor nations. In such countries, laws restricting access to resources for economic gain can have a detrimental effect on the economy. The primany goal of the nation is look after its citizens, so in this case the forest area should be used for boosting the economy by utilizing the natural resources and clearing the lands for agriculture.
Secondly, for developed nations, strict laws should be passed for the protection of forest. We are already withnissing the effects of global warming and the distruction of forests acts as a catalyst in preponing a catastropic event. Because in absence of such laws, greedy businesess with eradicate forests without hesitaction even though it can be for small economic gain. We fail to understand the work done by the forest to clear the air and in mainting water cycles. It would take trillions of dollors to develop a similar machine with purifies air and that it just one of the many roles played by forests. The benifits of preserving the forest outweight that of the small economic gains caused by their eradication.
Furthermore, it is possible to preserve and get economic benifits from the forests at the same time. Tourism provides a great solution where the country can benifit from keeping the forest in prestine condition and earn from the tourists who can come to appreciate the nature.
To sum up, we cannot propose a golden rule that applies to everyone, hence contries will well to do economy should pass stringent laws to protect the most priceless resource - wilderness areas. But for countries with no so well to do economies, they should use the forest to improve the condition of country and alliviate the living conditions of its citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 37
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 70
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...this question hinges on the status of a nations economy. For a country with unstable an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01578947368 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7812728637 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1381109644 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248651480289 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831294568143 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759359408679 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139981403942 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751481777035 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.