In some countries, it is illegal to reject a job application because of the applicant's age.
Is it positive or negative?
While in some countries it is against law to turn down job applicants with regards to their age, the merits and demerits of formulating a policy about this case are under debate. Although it is plainly obvious that the underlying cause of such laws is to protect the workforce, it is still not a good idea to enforce such policies as laws as it could lead to other workplace problems.
Companies, usually the ones that are highly-agile and founded by an entrepreneur, tend to hire younger workforce as it gives them the opportunity to shape their workforce as they please. These companies argue that by hiring a young employee, they would develop a more energetic and passionate environment which is more suitable for an innovative project. Today, more than ever, HR teams are concerned with teams' structure and its atmosphere and it is a priority to set up a team of people who can function as a whole. By enforcing employees from different ages to work together, it could be a challenging job to set up an adaptable team.
On the other hand, governments have yet the responsibility to take care of the workforce who are at their mid-forties or fifties. By enforcing this law, governments are putting the pressure on public and private sectors in order to tackle the unemployment issue of the older workforce. Although we know undoubtedly that the sole purpose of this law is workforce protection, it is yet to be revised to function at the workforce’s benefit. Employees who have a decade of experience on a matter may not be the most suitable candidates for a start-up company and its day-to-day challenges, however, there are positions that suits their gained skills and knowledge in other companies. Companies should be authorized to decide based on the position and their culture to accept or reject an applicant and by deploying some encouraging policies, companies would be triggered to use older workforce wherever and whenever they can.
Hiring employees of different ages always have some benefits and drawbacks; while a young employee is more energetic and innovative, an old one is equipped with skills and vast knowledge. Companies must have the right to choose based on their needs and culture so they can optimize their throughput. Governments should formulate encouraging policies to motivate HR strategists to put older employees into work.
- Some people believe that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences. Others may think there are alternative ways to this problem.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Write at least 250 words. 67
- Some people think it is more important to spend time in developing a successful career while others think it is more important to spend time with friends and family Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- In some countries, it is illegal to reject a job application because of the applicant's age.Is it positive or negative? 73
- Some psychologists believe that to overcome stress, it is important to spend some time doing nothing productive.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Write at least 250 words. 56
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people’s lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibilities.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could lead to other workplace problems. Companies, usually the ones that are hig...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enging job to set up an adaptable team. On the other hand, governments have yet ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05852417303 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95211016918 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529262086514 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1401908858 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107781351723 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359093098903 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552112240807 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647397942166 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034021775845 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.